Literary Analysis Of Emily Griersons Death In Faulkner

This is a gothic tale following a tragic figure spanning nearly three decades. .Emily Grierson a penniless spinster not of her own choosing enumerating her life journey into isolation and psychosis. The last of the aristocratic Grierson family who called the town of Jefferson home nestled in Yoknapatawpha County Mississippi. She is unable to move forward with a changing time as she clings to her family’s former privileged social status, as a result she cannot let go of the past. The townsfolk collectively narrates the story first person through gossip and hearsay. Rich in imagery the story is told non-linear fashion, making great use of both flashback and fore-shadowing in five parts. In essence temporal jumps from the present to past and†¦show more content†¦Nevertheless, Emily proves to be a strong willed person treating the men sent to collect taxes from her away like children. The story draws from the past a similar situation â€Å"That was two years earlier after her fa-ther’s death and a short time after her sweetheart-the one we believed would marry her-had de-serted her† (Faulkner 310). When her sweet heart leaves, she begins periods of seclusion. Tobe, her manservant is described as coming to and fro from the house with the market basket. Her house and property begin to smell bad. For this reason, the townsfolk believe it is due to Tobe being a man does not belong in the kitchen essentially making it foul or he likely killed an animal in the yard. After more complaints and the younger alderman insisting on confronting Emily Judge Stevens responds â€Å"Dammit sir, will you accuse a lady to her face of smelling bad?† (Faulkner 311) and he sends men to her property at night to spread lime as not to embarrass her by doing it during daylight. Here is another example of tradition dictating the action and trump-ing modernity. In this li ght, I get the clear sense the older generation of townsfolk are enablers of Emily. Although the townsfolk knew of Emily’s great aunt going mad years earlier they ignored Emily’s outward signs of a fragile metal state. Thus, they simply chalk it up as southern debu-tante eccentricities of privilege. To illustrate, her denial of her father’s death when â€Å"Miss Emily met them at theShow MoreRelated The Role of the Watch in William Faulkners A Rose for Emily1199 Words   |  5 PagesThe Role of the Watch in William Faulkners A Rose for Emily Even the casual reader of William Faulkner will recognize the element of time as a crucial one in much of the writers work, and the critical attention given to the subject of time in Faulkner most certainly fills many pages of criticism. A goodly number of those pages of criticism deal with the well-known short story, A Rose for Emily. Several scholars, most notably Paul McGlynn, have worked to untangle the confusing chronologyRead MoreEmily Grierson Motive to Kill Homer Barron1425 Words   |  6 PagesWilliam Faulkner’s â€Å"A Rose for Emily† is an intriguing tale of the life and death of Emily Grierson, who ends up killing her male companion, Homer Barron. A motive is not stated by the narrator, but when read critically a motive can be found. Several Literary critics have proposed different motives of why Emily Grierson killed Homer Barron. Some say that Homer was going to jilt Emily. Although homer was the not the marrying type, there is no evidence that homer wa s going to leave her. Another motiveRead MoreThe Importance Of Time In A Rose For Emily By William Faulkner917 Words   |  4 PagesRose for Emily,† is one his works that time is a crucial element. Several scholars have worked to understand the confusing chronology of this work, while others have given many reasons for Emily Grierson’s refusal to acknowledge the passage of time. Through all the years of careful literary analysis, no one has addressed one highly significant detail. When readers are first introduced to Miss Emily, she carries in her pocket an invisible watch ticking at the end of [a] gold chain (Faulkner 121). WhyRead MoreEmily Killing Homer: A Crime of Passion or an Act of a Frightened Girl864 Words   |  3 PagesEmily Killing Homer: a Crime of Passion or Act of Frightened Girl Faulkner’s tail of â€Å"A Rose for Emily † is a tail of thousand stories. Set up in the old south, at the same time it intrigues you and dazzles you. It tells the story of a daughter from an upper class family that ends up killing her male companion, Homer Baron. A motive for killing him is not stated in the story, but if red carefully one could be implied. Critiques disagree on what might have motived Emily to kill homer. Some sayRead MoreEssay on Connecting Symbols in A Rose for Emily1248 Words   |  5 PagesThe literary world contains a vast collection of works, each employing diverse techniques in writing. One technique commonly found in literature is the use of images and symbols. Symbols are sometimes complex and contain both literal and figurative significance. Symbolism in literature is commonly used to bind the attributes of an object with various segments of a story to provide the reader with a deeper understanding and sometimes hidden meaning. In th e short story, â€Å"A Rose for Emily† WilliamRead MoreEssay A Rose for Emily: Literary Analysis 2990 Words   |  4 PagesENG 102 Analysis Research Paper 09-25-10 Literary Analysis William Faulkner’s short story â€Å"A Rose for Emily† carries a theme represented by a dying breed of that era, while using symbolism to represent tragedy, loneliness and some form of pride, the story also shows how far one will go to have the approval of others and the pursuit of happiness. In today’s times, a person’s image could mean everything in life and almost everyone tries to fit into the main stream in some form at some pointRead More Faulkners A Rose for Emily Essay2369 Words   |  10 PagesFaulkners short story is the relationship between the past and present in Emily Grierson, the protagonist. She did not accept the passage of time throughout all her life, keeping everything she loved in the past with her. The story shows Emilys past and her family story. This information explains her behaviour towards time. Firstly, her fathers lack of desire to move on into the future and his old-fashioned ways kept Emily away from the changing society and away from any kind of social relationship: Read MoreANALIZ TEXT INTERPRETATION AND ANALYSIS28843 Words   |  116 Pagesï » ¿TEXT INTERPRETATION AND ANALYSIS The purpose of Text Interpretation and Analysis is a literary and linguistic commentary in which the reader explains what the text reveals under close examination. Any literary work is unique. It is created by the author in accordance with his vision and is permeated with his idea of the world. The reader’s interpretation is also highly individual and depends to a great extent on his knowledge and personal experience. That’s why one cannot lay down a fixed â€Å"model†

What techniques does Shakespeare use to reveal Iago’s villainy Free Essays

The play Othello is a stereotypical Shakespearean tragedy and it uses characters that are stereotypical of the views people had during the Jacobean period. Othello is a tragedy because the main characters die at the end f the play, also throughout the play themes of prejudice; deceit and love/hate are introduced. Shakespeare has used other sources other that his imagination for his plays. We will write a custom essay sample on What techniques does Shakespeare use to reveal Iago’s villainy? or any similar topic only for you Order Now ‘Othello’ was thought to have been taken from Hecatommithi, a collection of Italian short stories written by Giraldi Cinthio, the story seven contains many of the same names and situations as in Othello. In this essay I will analyze and comment on how Shakespeare uses techniques to reveal Iago’s villainy. I will look at what effects the techniques Shakespeare uses have on the way Iago is presented to the audience. In act 2 scene 3 ‘Othello’ we can clearly see the way Iago uses his surreptitious mind to persuade Othello that Desdemona is having an affair with Casio. Due to Iago’s manipulation of Othello, Othello starts to doubt Desdemona’s loyalty and becomes under Iago’s control. Iago uses a sly way to get Othello’s attention and get him to believe what he has to say is true, he uses phrases such as â€Å"my noble lord† using both a personal pronoun by saying â€Å"my† and flattery by calling Othello his â€Å"noble lord† which would be taken as a huge compliment. Othello interestedly says â€Å"what dost thou say, Iago?† Iago the produces a question â€Å"Did Michael Cassio, when you woo’d my lady know of your love?† which is, in this case, the first question to doubt Othello’s mind. Othello replies with â€Å"he did, from first to last, why dost thou ask?† meaning Cassio did know about their love, Othello is a it confused by the question so asks Iago why he asked, Iago then sneakily continues with â€Å"but for satisfaction of my thought, no further harm† and this is to keep Othello interested but still in doubt of what’s going on and what’s the point of it all. Iago used techniques of withholding information, this gets Othello curious as to why Iago is so inquisitive, this makes Othello frustrated by Iago’s confusing answers, he demands an answer, this makes the audience feel Othello is not as good character as he seemed and Iago is not as clever as he previously thought. Othello is very clever in the way that he tells Iago , â€Å"yes, and went between us very oft† here he tries to get information out of Iago about what’s going on because Othello had been incidentally reminded but Iago that Cassio has easy and frequent access to Desdemona so therefore senses that Iago is lying, which causes Iago to repeat his words out of coyness â€Å"honest my lord†, Iago is then worried that he had gone too far and saves himself with a brief answer to Othello my lord, for aught I know†. However Othello can’t be fooled that easily and still suspects something is going on and therefore assumed Iago is withholding information, so asks â€Å"what dost thou think?† Othello then falls deeper into his daze of doubt and tells Iago that he knows there is more to it that meets the eye, â€Å"nay there’s more in this.† Iago then tells Othello he is known of being false and nasty but it is what he has seen and heard â€Å"why say they are vilet false†, and Iago says to Othello that he doesn’t want to tell him, but needs to â€Å"it is my natures plague to spy into abuse† Iago tells Othello his story. Although Iago is careful not to say anything that could later be used against him, Othello becomes angry and annoyed, yet upset at what he thinks has happened, â€Å"†¦he echoes me, as if there were some monster in his thought too hideous to be shown† but then Iago cleverly ends the subject with â€Å"my lord, you know I love you† so that he can then bring it up later, and at the same time establishes Othello’s trust in him. After a long conversation with each other, Iago becomes more persuasive towards Othello, he tries to get Othello to agree with him but also leaving a bit of doubt in what he says â€Å"†¦I think that he is honest†, which Othello automatically believes he is honest if Iago says so, because he trusts him so much and at the time, is believing everything Iago is saying. Also that words Iago uses is important in the persuasion, such as â€Å"men should be what they seem† and â€Å"†¦ I think Cassio’s an honest man†, the significance of these words is important because Iago is leaving no evidence and is making sure he is not saying anything that other characters in the play, including Othello can use against him as evidence to prove he is a villain. This makes the readers feel slightly intimidated by the character Iago; he is cunning and devious and is very clever at carrying out his plans toward Othello. Shakespeare uses specific techniques to show that the manipulation of other characters by Iago. Iago makes the characters in the play believe he is honest when in fact he is deceiving them and is going behind their backs to turn others against them. For example, in act 3 scene 3 â€Å"my noble lord†. Iago is gaining Othello’s trust by using personal pronouns and addressing him as if they were the best of friends. By gaining Othello’s trust, Iago thinks Othello will listen to him more and is more likely to believe what he is saying. By having this advantage of being able to influence what Othello does and says, the other characters wouldn’t know what Iago is doing; but with Othello being in charge, Iago technically has control over the other characters by being able to influence Othello’s decisions. He later then says â€Å"o beware, my lord of jealousy† in this statement Iago is making Othello think about Cassio trying to get with Desdemona because he is jealous of Othello and Desdemona’s relationship. One of Iago’s techniques is to find the characters’ weaknesses and use it against them. One example of this is when Iago discovers Cassio’s weakness was alcohol; Cassio leaves Iago on his own, this gives him time to explain to the audience what he is planning to do. â€Å"If I can fasten but one cup on him†¦ He’ll be full of quarrel and offence† Then convinced him to have a few more drinks, he got drunk and started fighting. Iago did this because he wanted to get moved up ranking and wanted Cassio’s position so was trying to get him fired. Typical views of Italian men in the renaissance period involve scheming, and devious behavior. Shakespeare created Iago based on the personality traits of a typical Italian stereotype, Machiavelli. Machiavelli did anything it took to get to the top, much like Iago, who was willing to kill people so he could get a higher position, he was also deceitful and devious like Machiavelli because of his two faced treachery. Iago manages to persuade characters in the play to do things that will benefit him, things that they would not normally do, one of the main victims of this particular type of manipulation is Othello, and Iago manages to [persuade Othello to kill Desdemona, the love of his life! He does this by using persuasive techniques such as reverse intention, this occurs throughout the play, when Othello and Iago are talking about Cassio’s dream Othello shouts â€Å"monstrous† but Iago then says â€Å"nay† trying to imply it was only a dream, therefore minimizing the significance, at least, this is what Iago would theoretically be trying to do, however in this case he is actually trying to make Othello suspect more than a dream. At this point the audience know Iago is the villain because of the recent goings on in the play relating to trying get Cassio drunk, and his monologues so realize what he is trying to do. Another instance of reverse intention is when Iago states â€Å"let her live† he puts the idea of killing Desdemona in Othello’s mind despite never mentioning it in the first place. Iago purposely uses long sentences so Othello only notices the points he wants him to notice, subtly disguising the hints he imploys to imply Desdemona’s guilt, â€Å"I do beseech though I perchance and vicious in my guess ( as I confess it is my natures plague they spy into my abuses and of my jealousy shape faults that are not)-that your wisdom from one that is so imperfectly conceits would not notice, nor build yourself a trouble out of his scattering and unsure observance†, Although the character Iago is saying he is vicious in his guess, and then tries to accuse Othello of mistakenly imagining things, he is basically trying to avoid having to say something unpleasant, trying to direct Othello away from the point that was made. The commentary then gets Othello confused, he asks, â€Å"What dost thou mean?† Iago then has tie plain it, quite distressing Othello, it makes Othello think Iago is accusing him of a life of jealousy which he gets quite offended by. In the play, Shakespeare purposely structures it Iago’s villainy it revealed at the end, if this were not the case, and the characters realized Iago’s villainy at the beginning or earlier on in the play, there would be no storyline, the play is only based around two days, here would be no themes of deceit, death, heartbreak and villainy, so structuring the play in this way was the best way of presenting the tragedy. Also, because the play was only based on two days, this would not gave given Desdemona any time to be unfaithful to Othello, therefore undermining the belief for Othello’s guilt. Iago is clever by covering his deception by never saying anything that he would think Othello would take offence to or not believe, he only says things he knows Othello is thinking anyway so he doesn’t get himself into trouble, he never even suggests anything he just presents them as mere ideas so people have nothing to blame on him later on it the play † to grosses issues, nor larger reach than to suspicion† Iago is urging Othello to take a different course of action in certainty he is only planting the idea in his mind. Racism and prejudice would be a difficult theme to portray if Iago’s villainy was revealed at the beginning, Othello would never befriend a known villain because he is hated enough for his race, he feels alien to Desdemona and his other characters n the play, â€Å"his own clime, complexion and degree†, this makes Othello feel alienated, â€Å"set on thy wife†, Othello has moved from feeling fine to feeling low, he sunk very quickly after Iago mentioned he is different to Desdemona, he took things to heart easily and took offence very easily. Until the end, Othello has no suspicion towards Iago’s villainy, this is strange as Iago is trying to turn Othello against his beloved wife, he tries to imply this has cheated on him, he is jealous and he is imagining things, all false accusations, yet Othello notices nothing, because of the repeated use of the word honest when talking about Iago. How to cite What techniques does Shakespeare use to reveal Iago’s villainy?, Papers

ASEAN in the late 1960s

Question: Discuss about the Article for ASEAN in the late 1960s? Answer: According to me, the suitable theory that explains the creation of ASEAN in the late 1960s are the wants and longing of the state actors to organize an economic foundation common to all that has the capability to secure the growth. They desire to promote their own self-interests on the weaker economies when they had a confrontation with developing economies like Japan and China on the international platform. This desire has proved both beneficial and non-beneficial to ASEAN. It has gained an influential position with the engagement with Japan and China.[1] However, it has given the opportunity to the said countries to take active participation in the process of discussion. I believe that ASEAN will be in the forefront in the economic perspective. However, it will not play a major role in the diplomatic issues or problems of the region. ASEAN lacks the capability to administer decisions on the actors to pursue their policies freely. Therefore, it can be a major obstacle to them.[2] On the other hand, if they ignore the policies, it will be disadvantageous to them. ASEAN must have the power to enforce decisions to achieve an authoritative position. However, to achieve the power, ASEAN will lose the support of its member states, which places a premium on sovereignty at the individual level. References Chakraborty and A. Kumar, "ASEAN And China: New Dimensions In Economic Engagement",China Report48, no. 3 (2012): 327-349. Jorge L. Contreras, "Divergent Patterns Of Engagement In Internet Standardization: Japan, Korea And China",Telecommunications Policy38, no. 10 (2014): 914-932. [1] Chakraborty, D., and A. Kumar. "ASEAN And China: New Dimensions In Economic Engagement".China Report48, no. 3 (2012): 327-349. [2] Contreras, Jorge L. "Divergent Patterns Of Engagement In Internet Standardization: Japan, Korea And China".Telecommunications Policy38, no. 10 (2014): 914-932.